Fools, Dupes, and Knaves: a quick primer on the modern antiwar movement.

I plan to be using these categories quite often in the next few months – or years! – so I think that I should define my terms, here. It is vitally important that, when you are showing your disapproval for someone, that you be as precise as you can be about why you disapprove. After all, it would never do to let a Knave skate by on an improper Dupe designation, or have a Dupe be mistaken for a Fool. Also, one other note: ‘antiwar movement’ here is defined as being the people who actively march, support, and/or attempt to change public opinion on our current foreign and political policies. Your Aunt Peggy who doesn’t like it when we send troops abroad to places where they’re getting shot at*, and who happens to say so at Thanksgiving dinner, is neither a Fool, a Dupe, nor a Knave. Unless she’s giving money to Code Pink, or something. In which case, I’m sorry to hear that.

Anyway, the designations:

  • Fools. These are the True Believers. Hardcore progressive activists (low- to mid-level cadre), sincere radical Marxists, red diaper babies, half-brainwashed college students majoring in Useless Major Identity Studies, nomadic agitators, anybody who smells of paper-mache… these are the folks who believe what the Knaves tell them. These are the people who are upset right now that the Democrats abandoned their cause in 2009 just as soon as Obama took office… and the same people who will uncritically welcome back the Democrats in 2017. They are sincere. They are also stupid, and are useless for anything except giving a Knave money. Do not bother with them: they are not even worth extended mockery, let alone any attempts at conversion.
  • Dupes. The Dupe shares a characteristic with the Fool – they were sincerely against the war – but while the Fool is typically derived from one of several dreary Marxist or crypto-Marxist stereotypes, there is not really a standard Dupe. Some are disaffected Republicans who weren’t big on intervention; some are nostalgic Democrats; still others had issues with war aims, or strategies, or tactics, or even the personalities of the people running the GWOT. What every Dupe does have in common is that they were all conned by a Knave into thinking that either the antiwar movement, the Democratic party, or both were actually interested in the …read more    

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *